SkillScope

SkillScope

An adaptive soft-skills assessment where the questions are written for you. Sign in to begin — an account keeps the running costs predictable, and nothing beyond a username and a password hash is stored.

Length is the only rule — a short phrase beats a mangled word.

Your answers are sent to Google's Gemini API to generate the questions and grade the writing, and are not stored by this service. Accounts exist only to gate access and to meter the model spend.

What are you actually good at?

Not a fixed quiz. Every item, every scenario, every role and every step of the plan is written for you — from your job, your industry, and how you answered the question before.

—items, adapting as you go
—written scenarios, with follow-ups
—roles in your candidate set

Eight skills measured

What's different here

  • The questions don't exist until you start. A static bank asks the same thing of a warehouse supervisor and a staff engineer. Yours are generated in blocks from your context and your running profile, so a scenario is about your actual working day.
  • It gets harder as you do better. Score well on something and the next items on it are ones where all four options are defensible and the difference is cost, sequence, or who you go to first.
  • You have to write, not just pick. Five open scenarios chosen from your own answers, graded on the behaviour you describe rather than how well you write. Answer thinly and you'll get asked one more question about it.
  • Your answering is audited. Contradictory pairs, textbook-answering, flat-lining and speeding are all detected and shown to you, and they lower the confidence attached to your result.
  • Scores can move against you. Written evidence is blended into the profile at a hard cap of 40% weight, scaled by how confident the grader is. Claiming a strength you can't demonstrate costs you points.
  • You get a route, not just a verdict. A staged path from your current job to the role you want, built from things you can start this week without a budget or permission.

Because the items are written for you, your scores describe you against yourself across the eight skills. They are not percentiles and they are not comparable to anybody else's.

Where are you now?

All optional — but this is what the questions are generated from, as well as what the transition path is built on. Skip it and you'll get generic items and role matches without a route.

The scenarios are set in this job, so a rough title beats none.
Its plan comes first even if the fit turns out to be poor, and the skills it leans on get probed harder.
Anything that rules options out?

Writing your next questions

Choosing which skills are still least certain, then writing items aimed at your current level on them.

Press 1–5 to answer, ← to go back. Progress is saved in this browser, including the questions themselves.

Choosing your scenarios

Reading your answers for contradictions and the skills worth testing hardest.

What would you actually do?

0 words
Reading your answers back

Checking whether any of them needs one more question before they're graded.

Blank answers lower the confidence in your result rather than your score — but a real answer is worth far more than a tidy one.

Grading your written answers

Scoring each against its rubric, blending the evidence into your profile, then re-ranking every role in your candidate set.

That didn't work